![]() ![]() A summary, on the other hand, does not require you to critique or respond to the ideas in a text. An analysis is a discussion of ideas, techniques, and/or meaning in a text. Many students make the mistake of confusing summary with analysis. Instead, you should extract only those elements that you think are most important-the main idea (or thesis) and its essential supporting points, which in the original passage may have been interwoven with less important material. To include every detail is neither necessary nor desirable. To summarize is to condense a text to its main points and to do so in your own words. When you write a summary, you are demonstrating your understanding of the text and communicating it to your reader. When you underline and annotate a text, when you ask yourself questions about its contents, when you work out an outline of its structure, you are establishing your understanding of what you are reading. Authors should also consider how the interpretation of the study’s findings may be affected by the study limitations.THE WRITING PROCESS Guidelines for Writing a Summary What Do These Findings Mean? Authors should reflect on the new knowledge generated by the research and the implications for practice, research, policy, or public health. Do include the headline numbers from the study, such as the sample size and key findings. What Did the Researchers Do and Find? Authors should briefly describe the study design that was used and the study’s major findings. Why Was This Study Done? Authors should reflect on what was known about the topic before the research was published and why the research was needed. Bullet points should be objective, brief, succinct, specific, accurate, and avoid technical language. We ask authors to provide 2-3 single sentence bullet points for each of the following questions. The text is subject to editorial change and should not simply repeat text from the abstract or manuscript. Authors should avoid the use of acronyms and complex terminology wherever possible. ![]() Authors should aim to highlight where the research study fits within a broader context and present the significance or possible implications of the study simply and objectively. The aim of the Author Summary is to make your findings accessible to a wide audience that includes both scientists and non-scientists. The Author Summary will be included as part of the manuscript to immediately follow the Abstract in published articles. We ask that all authors of research articles that are revised following peer-review write a short non-technical summary of their research for non-expert readers. Read the figure guidelines for more information about figure requirements at revision. Upload a TIFF or EPS file for each figure if you have not already done so. Upload a clean copy of your revised manuscript that does not show your changes. Upload this as a "Revised Article with Changes Highlighted” file. The best way to show these changes is the “Track Changes” option in Microsoft Word. Include a marked-up copy of your manuscript file showing the changes you have made since the original submission. Upload this document as a “Response to reviewers” file. Remember, if you choose to publish the peer review history of your manuscript, your response to reviewers will appear online alongside the final article. Include your responses to all the reviewers’ and editors’ comments and list the changes you have made to the manuscript. Download the formatting checklist (PDF).Īddress the specific points made by each reviewer. ![]() We recommend that you refer to our checklist of formatting requirements before resubmitting in order to expedite your manuscript through the technical checks. The journal performs technical checks when you resubmit your manuscript to ensure that it meets our formatting and publishing requirements.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |